TITLE: Self-Disposal

MEDIUM: Photograph

There I was, rounding the corner of James and King Streets in Hamilton's Central area again when I came upon this severely intoxicated man lying on the sidewalk. At the same time, two police officers arrived in a paddy wagon to collect this poor soul off of the street and take him to detox.

As I was shooting, one manĖa senior citizen, approached me to complain about the homeless and what they're doing to the downtown core and society. Was this man homeless? I donít know. He might not have been. Not every staggering or semi-conscious drunk on the street is a stereotypical skid row bum. Sometimes when I come across instances like these, I'm able to get a bit of the story but this is one of the times when that wasn't going to happen.

One of the uniformed officers asked me why I was shooting. I told him that I'm a local artist with a particular interest in the city's diverse social cultures. After he and his partner placed the inebriated sluggard into the back of the van, he tossed his head back and to his right, chuckled and then casually said with a smirk and a nod, "You'll find all kinds!"

What drives a person to such self-loathing and self-destruction that they'll literally cast themselves away to the street like improperly disposed trash instead of seeking help? I'm not out to save the world but I really would like to know what can we really do to help people end their suffering? Am I supposed to be happy about this or merely indifferent? I live here too, and I proudly have a conscience.

Some people angrily or sarcastically insist that the answer to a lot of people's problems like poverty, depression, alcoholism and drug addiction is to go back to school and learn a new career that will give them higher earning power. That's a good idea initially. The 2004 Ontario Early Years Community Profile on the City of Hamilton shows that in 2001 approximately a third of the city's population, in all age groups over 20 years, had no more than some post secondary education. Unfortunately, the brick wall ahead of sending mature folks back to school is the matter of all those people who have genuine learning and/or social disabilities. They're simply not going to be accepted into any college or university, even if they are somehow able to scrape together the tuition through their cycle of dire poverty. Virtually everyone who has gone to school in Ontario on government assistance programs like OSAP (Ontario Student Assistance Program) also say that the government has never exactly been generous either.

It's hard to find stats on such disabilities that have come out since the start of what we used to call "the New Millennium". The old reports, however, are still enlightening. Perhaps it's an indication that new studies about this problem are unnecessary:

Despite the usual complaints, does anyone really care about what happens to such people and how adversely their economic position really impacts society? It doesn't seem like it. There are a huge number of government and private non-profit agencies dedicated to this issue; many of them have been around for decades but as resources, they continue to be grossly ineffective in stemming the tide of poverty problems related to learning and social disabilities. I'm afraid that for Hamilton to get on top of its own major poverty crisis, it will take much more than people going back to school.

Funny thing about those old reports though, and people's opinion about others' lack of earning potential. I've come across many who are quite willing to share their profound examples of people whom they feel they know have landed management positions in companies, one way or another, while severely lacking interpersonal skills, and even training and experience for those jobs. Nepotism is usually blamed. If this is true, it begs the question; is the importance of developed work skill and competence, in reality, as important as many like to believe or is it largely just another baseless perception? Could the answer be the reason why it is so difficult to find reliable new reports?

As with any other genuine world city, drug culture has a profoundly strong presence in the lives of many, not all, of those people with social and learning disabilities. Whether alcohol or narcotics, I've met many just within this city who have said that they still or used to participate in substance abuse to some extent. I can't say that I've been able to actually get to really know these people to verify any of their claims. They were all merely acquaintances. I've only actually known a scant number of people who have said that they used to do it or "tried it" and gave it up because they "regretted" it.

I really can't say that any of these people I truly know have what I would perceive to be a social or learning disability. Of those acquaintances I have come across, however, it seems a little to overwhelmingly obvious that they have been predestined for difficulty. I find from the few able or willing to express themselves on the matter that they knew from very early in their childhood that they had these deficiencies, even before someone with some sort of academic degree gave them an expert diagnosis. Through their academic and social difficulties in school, they eventually resulted to thinking of and referring to themselves as "retards", "stupid", "idiots", "goofs", "morons" and "losers" and opted to cop out of the established and rigid system of preparing for life in modern society. Their means of escape quickly became drugs and alcohol.

Yes, there are people who have impressive alternative ways of educating those who seem impossible to train but the truth is those people are rare, and sometimes overlooked because their unconventional approach to teaching isn't permitted because it's not recognized by some official board or ministry. Additionally, and in truth, the learning disabled who enter the few such established programs know that they become the subjects of gossip by those who excel in the status quo. "He's in that 'special-ed' class." "She needs a tutor." Whether deliberately meant to be harmful or not, these things negatively affect those who have such low self-esteem and many, not all, retreat into the drug culture. We all know that many of them permanently become part of that subculture.

So how do we fight this? How do we keep more of the learning disabled from joining that culture?

Snobbery helps to drive the problem. There are those whose attitude is (occasionally you find some who will boast about it openly), I have the education, money (sometimes the conceited are the worst substance abusers), good looks and connections to get ahead in this world, and even keep dysfunctional, underprivileged lowlifes like you down. People with learning disabilities are acutely aware that a variation of social Darwinism is still a pervasive problem in our modern industrialized society. Unable to cope, the self-loathed see this most unfortunate reality as yet more reason to lose themselves in a drunken or doped up haze.

How do we deal with this negative catalyst? Is it possible and practicable to initiate some sort of direct and public ad campaign to try and convince people to be more sensitive and politically correct towards those who have learning challenges for the sake of the everyone's dignity and even the economy? By comparison, how effective are the contemporary (post-1960's Civil Rights Movement) strategies on racism and sexism? How many in today's society are actually moved to care about that issue? If the answer is not enough, then how can we reach that same group of people who would dare look down upon someone with a learning disability? What do we do?

What about those self-esteem workshops, are they effective? Both juveniles and adults in our community need help but in consideration of the young, who are the most susceptible to the drug culture, can these motivational discourses successfully help a large number of youth for a long time, if not forever? Are there any reliable studies on this? If so, perhaps elementary and high schools should establish full-out curriculums on self-esteem. Teaching and counselling to encourage those who need it to believe in themselves more, and a pragmatic effort to educate the privileged to understand the difference between conceit and confidence, even though it's only a fine line between the two. Probably many of us, young and old, also need to learn the differences between sensitivity, insensitivity and indifference, and how to be more mindful of these psycho-social conditions.

Art for Charity: 100% net proceeds from the sales, rentals or leases of this image will be donated to a charitable organization, of MOFís choice, that is genuinely committed to poverty and homelessness reduction initiatives. Contact MOF to inquire which charitable organization is targeted at any given time to receive the proceeds.

Purchasing, verification, leasing and shipping: All listed prices are in Canadian funds. As computer monitor display settings can vary, prints may not exactly match the likeness of the image as seen on your monitor. A matching Statement of Authenticity is provided with all purchased fine art prints. The Statement of Authenticity provides information about the title, trim size and the Inventory Number of the image. Verification of the print's authenticity can be obtained through correspondence with MOF and providing all information on the certificate. This image is also available for lease through Photography Usage Licensing Agreements. Orders will begin processing upon receiving full payment. Framed prints are sold with frames customized to the artist/photographer's preference. Shipping and handling costs are added to the price of all orders (see following paragraph). Applicable taxes will be added to all orders within the Canadian province of Ontario. Payment is accepted in Canadian dollars (CDN) by cheque, bank draft or money order. Personal cheques from within North America will be held for at least 30 days for clearance. Payments are to be made out to Allan Hamilton.
North American orders will be shipped by Canada Post Xpresspost, and are expected to arrive within a few days to a week after being sent. Costs for packaging and shipping range from $20-40 depending on size and destination, and include insurance and tracking. A physical address is required for all orders. Post Office Box addresses are not accepted. Most items are expected to reach their destinations within 2 to 3 weeks after an order is placed but prints may also take up to 8 weeks to arrive depending on the image chosen, and MOF's assignment travel schedule. For rush orders or special needs, please contact MOF. Also contact MOF for outside North America shipping charges and delivery time estimates. Overseas orders are subject to duties and taxes which are charged upon delivery.
All prints are carefully created and inspected for the highest image reproduction standard, and packed securely for shipping. In the rare case where an order is incorrect, damaged in transit, or flawed in some way, please contact MOF immediately to advise. MOF will take the necessary measures to correct the situation. Please retain all packaging exactly as received in damage insurance related claims. After the carrier has inspected the item or contacted you for a statement, and settled with MOF, MOF will replace the item at no cost to you. MOF takes pride in providing only the finest quality art products. All sales are final.
Use the contact link at the bottom of this page to inquire about rental and leasing conditions, commissioning artwork or if you just want to say hello and talk about art and photography. MOF reserves the right to edit and post any letters it deems appropriate on this web site.

Return to Steeltown Neighbourhoods Gallery

Return to the Central Photo Essay of the Steeltown Neighbourhoods Gallery

To Hamilton City Gallery and Photo Essay

God's Messenger

Sidewalk Prayer

Holding On to Love

Showin' 'Em How It's Done


Blue Collar


Keeping Our Distances

Reading On

George Street


Have a Nice Day

Contact Allan Hamilton